This is damn well ridiculous and I am... practically speechless. ME! Speechless. Really, it almost never happens.
I have been trying to catch up with the news I missed yesterday while at home feeling miserable and, of course, with kick off only 22 days away, I am looking at all of the sports sites and blogs. Now I didn't see anything about Steve 'the old ball coach' Spurrier whining about his recruits on any of the websites that I usually read, but I was up to the minute informed thanks to the well-informed blogosphere. According to The Wishbone
" Michael Bowman and Arkee Smith, two members of Spurrier's touted recruiting class of last year, were cleared by the NCAA, but denied by SC's admissions department."
Now I understand that this would annoy Spurrier, but shit happens. Only the shit happened to USC's admission standards and not to Spurrier's recruiting class. Apparently
"In response, the school has created a committee that includes president Andrew Sorensen, athletic director Eric Hyman, professors, coaches and other administrators to discuss the university's special admissions process for athletes"
So instead of working with these young men, maybe suggesting a local juco or tutoring, instead of ensuring that they are ready to begin college, they are going to LOWER THE ADMISSION STANDARDS to get them in. I am, frankly, appalled. And I hope it never happens at the University of Florida. I love college football, and I joke that the only reason we keep Vandy in the SEC is to keep up our GPA, but I truly believe that college is for an education. Extra curricular activities should continue to be extra.
It probably happened in Gainesville (aka TitleTown) when Spurrier was coaching there. The 'net was not quite as prevelant then so we weren't all privy to the intimate details. Maybe learning the details will help us keep this sort of thing from happening in the future.
Friday, August 10, 2007
Baby steps they may be... but they are headed in the right direction
I didn't work yesterday, I had some bug (not sure I am over it, but I am back at work) and the most intelligent TV I watched between napping was "My Cousin Vinny" (I love that movie).
So I was dumbfounded when I heard on the radio this morning that I had missed last night's milestone event for the Democratic hopefuls. This was sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign and the TV channel, Logo. Both of these entities are gay rights supporters and I have to commend them for this occurence. This gave the American people who care about human rights more knowledge of those running for President. This gave the Democratic hopefuls a place to share their views, beliefs, etc. And it proved, once again, that the Repubs have no interest in anyone different from themselves (white, male, straight, rich) as they have all turned down an invitation to participate in an event like this one for themselves.
I was saddened that none of the front runners felt that the word 'marriage' could be used within the GLBT community. I, personally, believe that the term 'civil union' returns us to the separate but equal policy that was stricken down in 1954 in Brown v the Board of Education. Separate schools for different races were not equal then and civil unions for homosexuals is not equal to marriage for heterosexuals today. But I am hoping that if homosexuals are given the right to marry via civil unions then eventually we will drop the semantics and accept everyone as equals. I may be wrong, but I hope not. On this issue I think baby steps are the only ones that are going to be taken, but the steps are taking us in a direction that will bring equality to all Americans. It is much better than a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as one man/one woman anyway.
On a much happier note, however, all of the candidates believe that it is reasonable to:
"repeal the Don't ask, don't tell policy that prevents gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military. Include gays, lesbians and transgendered people in hate crimes laws. And protect gays lesbians and transgendered people form discrimination in jobs and housing"
"Don't ask/don't tell" was a milestone in its time and I think President Clinton did a wonderful thing by opening the door for equality, but I think it is time to take it farther. Wouldn't it nice if one day "all men are created equal" really did mean EVERYONE?
So I was dumbfounded when I heard on the radio this morning that I had missed last night's milestone event for the Democratic hopefuls. This was sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign and the TV channel, Logo. Both of these entities are gay rights supporters and I have to commend them for this occurence. This gave the American people who care about human rights more knowledge of those running for President. This gave the Democratic hopefuls a place to share their views, beliefs, etc. And it proved, once again, that the Repubs have no interest in anyone different from themselves (white, male, straight, rich) as they have all turned down an invitation to participate in an event like this one for themselves.
I was saddened that none of the front runners felt that the word 'marriage' could be used within the GLBT community. I, personally, believe that the term 'civil union' returns us to the separate but equal policy that was stricken down in 1954 in Brown v the Board of Education. Separate schools for different races were not equal then and civil unions for homosexuals is not equal to marriage for heterosexuals today. But I am hoping that if homosexuals are given the right to marry via civil unions then eventually we will drop the semantics and accept everyone as equals. I may be wrong, but I hope not. On this issue I think baby steps are the only ones that are going to be taken, but the steps are taking us in a direction that will bring equality to all Americans. It is much better than a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as one man/one woman anyway.
On a much happier note, however, all of the candidates believe that it is reasonable to:
"repeal the Don't ask, don't tell policy that prevents gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military. Include gays, lesbians and transgendered people in hate crimes laws. And protect gays lesbians and transgendered people form discrimination in jobs and housing"
"Don't ask/don't tell" was a milestone in its time and I think President Clinton did a wonderful thing by opening the door for equality, but I think it is time to take it farther. Wouldn't it nice if one day "all men are created equal" really did mean EVERYONE?
I got a 100%
I found this over at UncommonSense and these things tickle me, so I took it. I strongly agreed with everything and ended up 100% feminist. I can't imagine why a person would not agree with these statements.
| You Are 100% Feminist |
You are a total feminist. This doesn't mean you're a man hater (in fact, you may be a man). You just think that men and women should be treated equally. It's a simple idea but somehow complicated for the world to put into action. |
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
A War Quote
“It doesn't require any particular bravery to stand on the floor of the Senate and urge our boys in Vietnam to fight harder, and if this war mushrooms into a major conflict and a hundred thousand young Americans are killed, it won't be U. S. Senators who die. It will be American soldiers who are too young to qualify for the senate.” George McGovern.
Please feel free to substitute Iraq for Vietnam.
Please feel free to substitute Iraq for Vietnam.
Thank you for your Support Part II
I wrote about how this administration is failing the every day soldier here. It is a sad tale about abuse and neglect and much more. The story carries over further into the civilian world, however, and a study has been published on how this illegal horror that is being called a war is affecting those left behind.
This study was for the Army only, not the AF, Marines, or Navy, so there is no way to know if these results are common across the military, or possibly even worse for other branches of service. And, according to the story at Time.com , this is only enlisted personnel (or at least that is the way that I am reading it). The study shows that the parent that is left home with the children (or just a child) when the active duty member is deployed is not dealing well with the stress of single parenthood.
"Rates of neglect and abuse of the children of servicemen
and women rose 42% within the family when the enlisted
parent was deployed on a combat mission,".
FORTY TWO PERCENT. Holy shit. The study blames stress for the fact that parents who normally do not abuse or neglect their children ARE abusing and neglecting their children.
The part that is not explained in this story and the part that I am most interested in is the age of the abusers/neglecters. While it is great to allow 18 year olds to fight for their country(oil) and it is legal for them to marry, they are not equipped to deal with parenting a small child or children alone, across the country from their support network. Yes, the military (or at least the AF) has a system in place to help those under a great amount of stress, but these kids may be ashamed, embarrassed, or, frankly, may not know the system is there.
DSD loves that show, "The Unit", he will not even speak to me while it is on except during commercials. I am not sure he would leave the house if it were on fire. And while I have no experience being on a super secret Delta Force like mission, I can tell you from experience that the stories about the women/wives left behind is absolute pure BS. That isn't how it is for the average soldier/sailor/marine/airman's wife/spouse. It is about trying to find your way around a new town, not knowing a sole, trying to find a job/daycare/something to do with and for the kids.
I was alone with my son from 3 days before his 1st birthday until he was over 17 1/2 months old. It wasn't easy & I was luckier than I could ever believe possible because my parents were only 2 hours away and I had friends on the base. I could pack up the 2 of us and head to Mom and Dad's when my stress level got too high. When they got on my nerves, I could go home. When I caught the stomach 'flu, Dee across the street came over and took care of my son for the morning. When I started crying and couldn't stop, Karen from down the street came and got him and let him play with her kids.
I had help, and a lot of it. I had plenty of support and it was still a stressful time. And my ex was having the time of his life in Key West, not in a Combat Zone.
I am not shocked by these numbers, although they make me sad, but I have been mad, sad, shocked, appalled and sick over the atrocities committed by this administration for years. All I can do now is hope this does not have long term effects on these poor kids.
This study was for the Army only, not the AF, Marines, or Navy, so there is no way to know if these results are common across the military, or possibly even worse for other branches of service. And, according to the story at Time.com , this is only enlisted personnel (or at least that is the way that I am reading it). The study shows that the parent that is left home with the children (or just a child) when the active duty member is deployed is not dealing well with the stress of single parenthood.
"Rates of neglect and abuse of the children of servicemen
and women rose 42% within the family when the enlisted
parent was deployed on a combat mission,".
FORTY TWO PERCENT. Holy shit. The study blames stress for the fact that parents who normally do not abuse or neglect their children ARE abusing and neglecting their children.
The part that is not explained in this story and the part that I am most interested in is the age of the abusers/neglecters. While it is great to allow 18 year olds to fight for their country(oil) and it is legal for them to marry, they are not equipped to deal with parenting a small child or children alone, across the country from their support network. Yes, the military (or at least the AF) has a system in place to help those under a great amount of stress, but these kids may be ashamed, embarrassed, or, frankly, may not know the system is there.
DSD loves that show, "The Unit", he will not even speak to me while it is on except during commercials. I am not sure he would leave the house if it were on fire. And while I have no experience being on a super secret Delta Force like mission, I can tell you from experience that the stories about the women/wives left behind is absolute pure BS. That isn't how it is for the average soldier/sailor/marine/airman's wife/spouse. It is about trying to find your way around a new town, not knowing a sole, trying to find a job/daycare/something to do with and for the kids.
I was alone with my son from 3 days before his 1st birthday until he was over 17 1/2 months old. It wasn't easy & I was luckier than I could ever believe possible because my parents were only 2 hours away and I had friends on the base. I could pack up the 2 of us and head to Mom and Dad's when my stress level got too high. When they got on my nerves, I could go home. When I caught the stomach 'flu, Dee across the street came over and took care of my son for the morning. When I started crying and couldn't stop, Karen from down the street came and got him and let him play with her kids.
I had help, and a lot of it. I had plenty of support and it was still a stressful time. And my ex was having the time of his life in Key West, not in a Combat Zone.
I am not shocked by these numbers, although they make me sad, but I have been mad, sad, shocked, appalled and sick over the atrocities committed by this administration for years. All I can do now is hope this does not have long term effects on these poor kids.
Congratulations, Mr. Bonds
Well it is over. Barry Bonds is the new Home Run King with 756 Homeruns to his name. I am not sure how I feel about it. Part of me is sad, I was 7 when Hank hit #755. I am pretty sure I did not see it live, but I remember my dad calling my brother and me from the back of the house during the news to watch it. It felt HUGE and important. This does not.
Maybe there is just too much information floating around the world via the 'net and the 4000 possible TV stations. Maybe there is too much controversey surrounding Bonds. Maybe he used steroids and maybe he didn't. If he did, then he deserves nothing. If he didn't, then it is sad that this wonderful moment has been overshadowed by lies and innuendo.
Seems pretty sad that the entire game is that way now.
Maybe there is just too much information floating around the world via the 'net and the 4000 possible TV stations. Maybe there is too much controversey surrounding Bonds. Maybe he used steroids and maybe he didn't. If he did, then he deserves nothing. If he didn't, then it is sad that this wonderful moment has been overshadowed by lies and innuendo.
Seems pretty sad that the entire game is that way now.
Monday, August 6, 2007
Let's Hear It for the Kids
A month or so ago I did a blog on bratty children in television commercials. "Does it have leather seats?" still makes my blood boil, but it is nice to know that just because there are brats in the commercials not ALL of today's children are obnoxious assholes!
Juan and Alex Gomez are illegal aliens brought to this country by their parents when they were young. While the entire family is sitting in a detention center awaiting deportation Juan and Alex's friends have
"stormed D.C. with a teen lobbying effort that seemed like something
out of Mr. Smith Goes To Washington. "We're going to give it our all,"
Scott Elfenbein, one of Juan's schoolmates, told reporters on Capitol Hill.
"We have to show [Congress] the flaws in the system." Says Kelleen Corrigan,
detention attorney for the Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center (FIAC) in Miami,
which is working on behalf of Juan and Alex, "Juan is lucky to have such a dedicated,
extremely astute group of friends. It's been really touching to watch."
These are kids from Miami who have traveled to D.C. on behalf of their friends, working the system as it should be worked. I wish them luck.
********************************************************************************
Teenagers taking on Washington is great, but what is even scarier than W and Congress? The lunch lady! In an unrelated story, 2nd graders (these kids are 7 years old) got rid of the frozen green beans in their cafeteria. Isn't it great when the process works?
Juan and Alex Gomez are illegal aliens brought to this country by their parents when they were young. While the entire family is sitting in a detention center awaiting deportation Juan and Alex's friends have
"stormed D.C. with a teen lobbying effort that seemed like something
out of Mr. Smith Goes To Washington. "We're going to give it our all,"
Scott Elfenbein, one of Juan's schoolmates, told reporters on Capitol Hill.
"We have to show [Congress] the flaws in the system." Says Kelleen Corrigan,
detention attorney for the Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center (FIAC) in Miami,
which is working on behalf of Juan and Alex, "Juan is lucky to have such a dedicated,
extremely astute group of friends. It's been really touching to watch."
These are kids from Miami who have traveled to D.C. on behalf of their friends, working the system as it should be worked. I wish them luck.
********************************************************************************
Teenagers taking on Washington is great, but what is even scarier than W and Congress? The lunch lady! In an unrelated story, 2nd graders (these kids are 7 years old) got rid of the frozen green beans in their cafeteria. Isn't it great when the process works?
Friday, August 3, 2007
USA Today Releases Coach's Poll
LET THE PRE-SEASON SMACK TALK BEGIN!
Have I mentioned that I love College football? It is the best game in the whole wide world. What I don't love about it, however, are the polls. Especially the pre-season polls. They really are stupid. How do you take a team who has never played a game and rank them against another team who has never played a game? Sure the ranked colleges have played before, but with different players. The 2006 teams are not the 2007 teams and they will not be the 2008 team. The University of Florida lost 9 starters on defense alone, some to graduation, some just to go for the big bucks. How are this years 11 starters going to play together? WHO KNOWS?
That being said, I was actually shocked that USAToday had Florida at #3. I honestly figured they would be much lower just because the team is so young. And I would have preferred for them to be lower in the top ten. These young men are not the same team that won the National Championship last year and that is already A LOT of pressure. Being #3 is more pressure. And they are not looking at an easy season with Auburn and LSU back to back, plus we all know that FSU is not going to stink again this year.
Ahhhhh, football. 29 days to go! I, for one, am ready!
GO GATORS!
Have I mentioned that I love College football? It is the best game in the whole wide world. What I don't love about it, however, are the polls. Especially the pre-season polls. They really are stupid. How do you take a team who has never played a game and rank them against another team who has never played a game? Sure the ranked colleges have played before, but with different players. The 2006 teams are not the 2007 teams and they will not be the 2008 team. The University of Florida lost 9 starters on defense alone, some to graduation, some just to go for the big bucks. How are this years 11 starters going to play together? WHO KNOWS?
That being said, I was actually shocked that USAToday had Florida at #3. I honestly figured they would be much lower just because the team is so young. And I would have preferred for them to be lower in the top ten. These young men are not the same team that won the National Championship last year and that is already A LOT of pressure. Being #3 is more pressure. And they are not looking at an easy season with Auburn and LSU back to back, plus we all know that FSU is not going to stink again this year.
Ahhhhh, football. 29 days to go! I, for one, am ready!
GO GATORS!
HELP! Some advice for my friend, please
As I have mentioned my son is now 18 years old and will be attending college in a few weeks. While all children are different and most are difficult at times (as he was) for the most part, he has always been a very laid back, go with the flow child. Not counting the first three months (months that we both spent crying and I spent praying for just 30 straight minutes of sleep) he has always slept well. He has always been polite (publicly) and well spoken. Like I said, he is not, has not ever been or ever will be a perfect child, but he was a lot easier than a lot I have seen.
My friend, P, has two children. Her daughter, D, is 3 1/2 and her son, P2, is almost 17 months. D is a BRILLIANT child. My son spoke early, D was holding conversations at 13 months. This child created a reasonable facsimile of Churchill Downs (with blocks) after watching the Kentucky Derby with her father. She explained to her mother (after a fishing trip with her father) that the reason no fish were caught was because "We have over fished our current supply". She is not your average 3 year old, obviously.
Unfortunately, she is still only 3 so who knows if she has any understanding of what she says or was she just parrotting something she had heard? The problem is that there are times, like this morning, when she acts 13 or 14. Refusing to get dressed is one thing, but screaming in her mother's face and calling her mother crazy and taking her brother's library book from him (because she wanted ALL the books) and yelling that she WAS NOT going on a walk (which means riding in the stroller) because it meant no exercise for her is ridiculous. She has given up sleeping at naptime, but won't stay in her room. She gets out of bed 4 or 5 times a night before going to sleep. She is rude and nasty and ugly... at times. But sometimes she says "please" and "Thank you" without being reminded and sometimes she plays quietly with her brother without pushing him down. Is this normal and I was just lucky? Or is she out of control?
I think (at her age) a child should not be heard from after bedtime, except to use the bathroom or if they are hurt. (Obvious exception, in the middle of the night for night terrors or a nightmare, but that is AFTER they have slept). I think a child should not have to be told to do something 6 or 8 or 10 times. But, again, maybe I was just lucky. I didn't have a 2nd child, so I was probably still dressing my son at 3. I don't remember.
I think part of the problem is that D is bored. The family has recently moved from here on the Redneck Riviera to the eastern portion of North Carolina. Here everything (except real shopping) is no more than 15 minutes away. There, I guess, everything is 30 or more minutes. There are no pre-schools to be found. There are daycares who have a pre-school curriculum, but you have to pay for fulltime even if you only want your child to go 3 mornings a week. P is a stay at home mom and C (her husband) is active duty military, but not high ranking. P does take the children to the library once a week for story time and to check out books. D is supposed to start swim lessons (only last for 2 weeks) and then gymnastics once a week, but that still leaves a lot of hours to fill. D's birhday is in November, so she is not supposed to start kindergarten for another 2 years.
P has asked my advice, but I don't know what to tell her. I never had these problems. Has anyone else gone through this? Is she expecting too much? Is this just 3 year old blues? HELP!
My friend, P, has two children. Her daughter, D, is 3 1/2 and her son, P2, is almost 17 months. D is a BRILLIANT child. My son spoke early, D was holding conversations at 13 months. This child created a reasonable facsimile of Churchill Downs (with blocks) after watching the Kentucky Derby with her father. She explained to her mother (after a fishing trip with her father) that the reason no fish were caught was because "We have over fished our current supply". She is not your average 3 year old, obviously.
Unfortunately, she is still only 3 so who knows if she has any understanding of what she says or was she just parrotting something she had heard? The problem is that there are times, like this morning, when she acts 13 or 14. Refusing to get dressed is one thing, but screaming in her mother's face and calling her mother crazy and taking her brother's library book from him (because she wanted ALL the books) and yelling that she WAS NOT going on a walk (which means riding in the stroller) because it meant no exercise for her is ridiculous. She has given up sleeping at naptime, but won't stay in her room. She gets out of bed 4 or 5 times a night before going to sleep. She is rude and nasty and ugly... at times. But sometimes she says "please" and "Thank you" without being reminded and sometimes she plays quietly with her brother without pushing him down. Is this normal and I was just lucky? Or is she out of control?
I think (at her age) a child should not be heard from after bedtime, except to use the bathroom or if they are hurt. (Obvious exception, in the middle of the night for night terrors or a nightmare, but that is AFTER they have slept). I think a child should not have to be told to do something 6 or 8 or 10 times. But, again, maybe I was just lucky. I didn't have a 2nd child, so I was probably still dressing my son at 3. I don't remember.
I think part of the problem is that D is bored. The family has recently moved from here on the Redneck Riviera to the eastern portion of North Carolina. Here everything (except real shopping) is no more than 15 minutes away. There, I guess, everything is 30 or more minutes. There are no pre-schools to be found. There are daycares who have a pre-school curriculum, but you have to pay for fulltime even if you only want your child to go 3 mornings a week. P is a stay at home mom and C (her husband) is active duty military, but not high ranking. P does take the children to the library once a week for story time and to check out books. D is supposed to start swim lessons (only last for 2 weeks) and then gymnastics once a week, but that still leaves a lot of hours to fill. D's birhday is in November, so she is not supposed to start kindergarten for another 2 years.
P has asked my advice, but I don't know what to tell her. I never had these problems. Has anyone else gone through this? Is she expecting too much? Is this just 3 year old blues? HELP!
Thursday, August 2, 2007
Too Much to Say
I have been sitting here staring at a blank post for over an hour. There are things happening that I would love to write on, but everything I want to say sounds smartassy and flip to my own ears. While yesterday's tragic bridge collaps in Minnesota was not the worse thing that has ever happened to this country, I am certain it is the worse thing that has ever happened to a lot of people.
I have family in the Twin Cities. They do not have regular commuting hours so the chance that they were on that bridge is between slim and none. But no one has heard from them (Well, my parents haven't heard from them).
My heart goes out to those who have been touched in anyway by this horror.
**Updated Friday 3 Aug***
My aunt, uncle and grown cousins are all fine. I hope everyone else receives the same great news!
I have family in the Twin Cities. They do not have regular commuting hours so the chance that they were on that bridge is between slim and none. But no one has heard from them (Well, my parents haven't heard from them).
My heart goes out to those who have been touched in anyway by this horror.
**Updated Friday 3 Aug***
My aunt, uncle and grown cousins are all fine. I hope everyone else receives the same great news!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
